This touch screen monitor displayed the content of the
"control screen" of the project. The installation
visitor was invited to select by touching one or more
of 10 images, text excerpts and other thematic web
content dealing with the issues of the project in the
manner of a shopper choosing items from an online
catalog. Once their selection was made, they hit the
submit button on the same page.
Depending on what the installation
visitor chose to select, certain combinations of the
web content on the Inbox web site were downloaded to
be viewed by the web visitor. What was selected by the
installation visitor controls what the visitor to the
web site saw on the "display screen".
The web visitor is thus reduced to a voyeur with none of
the customary interactive control of the web. The
content is "pushed" at the web visitor using a custom
designed PERL script. Depending upon the degree of
risk taken by the installation visitor in their
selection at the point of control, the web visitor
saw certain possible combinations of the total
content available.
Qualitative graphic analysis was used to categorize
the content files of the project into risk/safety and
private/public pairs - it was "inspired" by
statistical analysis and grouping techniques used in
survey analysis. These binary relations where then fed
into an Excel chart. There are nearly 1000 possible
outcomes of someone's intervention with Inbox. These
outcomes are determined by the degree of "risk" taken
by the installation visitor.
In other words, the scope of the content presented to
you on the Inbox web site has been determined by the
choices made by the installation visitor in Winnipeg.
The risks they took circumscribed the breadth of each
different determinations of Inbox. Visiting the site,
the web visitor could choose between them.
Inbox is about intimacy and technology, control and
risk. It explores the nature of our being and
communicating in non-physical space. Virtual space is
not unlike psychological space, abstract and
non-linear. Inbox uses this type of space to
investigate the nature of our relationships to each
other and to the technology of the Internet. What is
the nature of a network : human or technological? How
do we function within it? How does it limit or expand
our connectedness? And how far are we willing to risk
intimacy if we can not see or touch the person with
whom that intimacy is possible?
In Inbox, web technology served as the means for the
exploration of how we approach intimacy through touch.
There is an ephemerality in touching; in the wanting
and longing for someone/something, in this seeking of
the unknown. Inbox explored this through the
juxtaposition of the technological with the intimacy
of touch.
|